"Legal experts said the case has little chance of succeeding, for a variety of reasons: Courts are wary of invalidating legally cast ballots. The issues raised, even if true, don't represent a constitutional question. And mail voting, used in many states, is both common and constitutional.
The suit has "lots of complaints about different things, and it’s not easy to see how they all fit together," said Kermit Roosevelt, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School who focuses on constitutional law.
Most mail ballots supported Biden
Most mail ballots in Pennsylvania favored Joe Biden, the Democratic challenger who has been projected the winner. The lawsuit argues that in-person voting, which favored Trump, had stricter safeguards, including adequate verification of voters’ identities and monitoring by observers.
In-person voting was marked by "transparency and verifiability," the lawsuit claims. Mail balloting, on the other hand, "was cloaked in darkness and complied with none of those transparency and verifiability requirements."
David Becker, executive director and founder of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, said the Trump campaign "continues to spread lies about transparency of this process and the access to observers. Trump campaign observers and Republican party observers were present at every moment that every ballot was considered in Pennsylvania."
He said the Trump campaign admitted as much during a hearing before a federal judge last week, when a lawyer said there were "a non-zero number" of observers from the campaign present during ballot counting in Philadelphia.
Fact check: We fact-checked President Trump's speech about the election. Here's what we found.
Noah Feldman, a professor at Harvard Law School, noted that Pennsylvania's system for identifying voters is the same — verification of their signature — whether they cast ballots in person or by mail.
Legal experts say lawsuit has no merit
Trump's campaign lawsuit seeks a temporary injunction preventing the state from certifying election results.
Laura Humphrey, a spokeswoman for Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar, said the office could not comment on pending litigation. Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro called the suit "meritless" and said the election was "overseen by bipartisan election officials and was lawful, fair and secure."
Shapiro said the lawsuit will end up like others filed in Pennsylvania, "found to have no merit by courts at all levels."
Legal experts agreed."
Вывод у всех один - иски никчемные с одной целью затянуть процесс признания Байдена президентом
Так что фернальны с-кот останется без пропитания
